1959 Alpine A 106 vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 277 more horse power than 1959 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 1959 Alpine A 106.

Because 1959 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Cadillac XTS has automatic transmission and 1959 Alpine A 106 has manual transmission. 1959 Alpine A 106 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac XTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Alpine A 106 2013 Cadillac XTS
Make Alpine Cadillac
Model A 106 XTS
Year Released 1959 2013
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 904 cc 3564 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 37 HP 314 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 6800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 3700 mm 5131 mm
Vehicle Width 1450 mm 1852 mm
Vehicle Height 1280 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2110 mm 2831 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 28 L 72 L