1959 Alvis TD vs. 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod
To start off, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alvis TD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alvis TD would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (469 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 352 more horse power than 1959 Alvis TD. (117 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod should accelerate faster than 1959 Alvis TD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Alvis TD weights approximately 123 kg more than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod.
Because 1959 Alvis TD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Alvis TD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Alvis TD (221 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. (178 Nm). This means 1959 Alvis TD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Alvis TD | 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod | |
Make | Alvis | Ford |
Model | TD | XR 8 Xplod |
Year Released | 1959 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 117 HP | 469 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1425 kg | 1302 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 132 L |