1959 Aston Martin DB2 vs. 2003 Chevrolet Tracker

To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Aston Martin DB2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Aston Martin DB2 would be higher. At 2,920 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Aston Martin DB2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Aston Martin DB2 (118 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Aston Martin DB2 should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Aston Martin DB2 (240 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1959 Aston Martin DB2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Aston Martin DB2 2003 Chevrolet Tracker
Make Aston Martin Chevrolet
Model DB2 Tracker
Year Released 1959 2003
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2920 cc 1590 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 97 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 240 Nm 139 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4310 mm 3860 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 2520 mm 2210 mm