1959 Aston Martin DB4 vs. 2000 Ford TL-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TL-50 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Aston Martin DB4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Aston Martin DB4 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Aston Martin DB4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Aston Martin DB4 (204 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Aston Martin DB4 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Aston Martin DB4 weights approximately 48 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Aston Martin DB4. (324 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Aston Martin DB4.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Aston Martin DB4 | 2000 Ford TL-50 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Ford |
Model | DB4 | TL-50 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3670 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 570 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1302 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 37 L |