1959 Aston Martin DB4 vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Aston Martin DB4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Aston Martin DB4 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Aston Martin DB4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Aston Martin DB4 (256 HP) has 189 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Aston Martin DB4 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1959 Aston Martin DB4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Aston Martin DB4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Aston Martin DB4 | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Aston Martin | Ford |
Model | DB4 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3670 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2490 mm |