1959 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 1997 Rover 414i
To start off, 1997 Rover 414i is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 (312 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1997 Rover 414i. (103 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 414i.
Because 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Aston Martin DBR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Rover 414i, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Aston Martin DBR2 | 1997 Rover 414i | |
Make | Aston Martin | Rover |
Model | DBR2 | 414i |
Year Released | 1959 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4164 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 312 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2780 mm |