1959 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2001 Renault Clio
To start off, 2001 Renault Clio is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 (312 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2001 Renault Clio. (230 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 2001 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Renault Clio has automatic transmission and 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 has manual transmission. 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Renault Clio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2001 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Renault |
| Model | DBR2 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4164 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 312 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 60 L |
