1959 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2003 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (500 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1959 Aston Martin DBR2. (312 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1959 Aston Martin DBR2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2003 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Aston Martin | Dodge |
Model | DBR2 | Ram |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4164 cc | 8277 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 312 HP | 500 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3030 mm |