1959 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2003 Ford Maverick
To start off, 2003 Ford Maverick is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 (312 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 2003 Ford Maverick. (123 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Maverick.
Because 2003 Ford Maverick is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Aston Martin DBR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Maverick will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2003 Ford Maverick | |
Make | Aston Martin | Ford |
Model | DBR2 | Maverick |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4164 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 312 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 62 L |