1959 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2004 Mazda B4000
To start off, 2004 Mazda B4000 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 (312 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B4000. (207 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B4000.
Because 2004 Mazda B4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Aston Martin DBR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2004 Mazda B4000 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Mazda |
Model | DBR2 | B4000 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4164 cc | 4031 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 312 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 74 L |