1959 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 (312 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2010 Cadillac CTS. (270 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 2010 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Aston Martin | Cadillac |
Model | DBR2 | CTS |
Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4164 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 312 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1504 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 68 L |