1959 Austin 7 vs. 2003 Cadillac Catera
To start off, 2003 Cadillac Catera is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin 7 would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac Catera (201 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1959 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 1095 kg more than 1959 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin 7 | 2003 Cadillac Catera | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | 7 | Catera |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 847 cc | 2962 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2940 mm |