1959 Austin 7 vs. 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom

To start off, 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin 7 would be higher. At 6,749 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom (454 HP @ 5350 RPM) has 421 more horse power than 1959 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1875 kg more than 1959 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Austin 7 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom
Make Austin Rolls-Royce
Model 7 Phantom
Year Released 1959 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 847 cc 6749 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 12 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 33 HP 454 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5350 RPM
Engine Bore Size 62.9 mm 92 mm
Engine Stroke Size 68.3 mm 84.6 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Vehicle Weight 610 kg 2485 kg
Vehicle Length 3060 mm 6090 mm
Vehicle Width 1450 mm 2000 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1640 mm
Wheelbase Size 2040 mm 3580 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]