1959 Austin 7 vs. 2010 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2010 Nissan Micra is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin 7 would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Micra (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1959 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Micra weights approximately 439 kg more than 1959 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin 7 | 2010 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | 7 | Micra |
Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 847 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 80.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1049 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2440 mm |