1959 Austin A 135 vs. 1980 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1980 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 135 would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Austin A 135 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1980 Cadillac Brougham.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin A 135 | 1980 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 135 | Brougham |
Year Released | 1959 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 5032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2080 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 3090 mm |