1959 Austin A 135 vs. 1996 Fiat Armadillo
To start off, 1996 Fiat Armadillo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 135 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Austin A 135 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Austin A 135 (150 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Austin A 135 should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Austin A 135 weights approximately 706 kg more than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1959 Austin A 135 (308 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (200 Nm). This means 1959 Austin A 135 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. 1996 Fiat Armadillo has automatic transmission and 1959 Austin A 135 has manual transmission. 1959 Austin A 135 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Fiat Armadillo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin A 135 | 1996 Fiat Armadillo | |
Make | Austin | Fiat |
Model | A 135 | Armadillo |
Year Released | 1959 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 308 Nm | 200 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2080 kg | 1374 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 1850 mm |