1959 Austin A 135 vs. 2002 Hyundai Matrix

To start off, 2002 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 135 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Austin A 135 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Austin A 135 (150 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2002 Hyundai Matrix. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Austin A 135 should accelerate faster than 2002 Hyundai Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Austin A 135 weights approximately 855 kg more than 2002 Hyundai Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1959 Austin A 135 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Austin A 135. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Hyundai Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Austin A 135 (308 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Hyundai Matrix. (144 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1959 Austin A 135 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Hyundai Matrix.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Austin A 135 2002 Hyundai Matrix
Make Austin Hyundai
Model A 135 Matrix
Year Released 1959 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3993 cc 1604 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 150 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 4100 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 308 Nm 144 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.3 mm 76.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 111.1 mm 87 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 7.6:1 10.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2080 kg 1225 kg
Vehicle Length 5110 mm 4030 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1680 mm 1640 mm
Wheelbase Size 3100 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 72 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]