1959 Austin A 135 vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 135 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Austin A 135 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Austin A 135 (150 HP) has 80 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Austin A 135 should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Austin A 135 weights approximately 1340 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Austin A 135 (308 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1959 Austin A 135 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Austin A 135 2004 MCC Crossblade
Make Austin MCC
Model A 135 Crossblade
Year Released 1959 2004
Engine Size 3993 cc 599 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 150 HP 70 HP
Torque 308 Nm 102 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 3210 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 2080 kg 740 kg
Vehicle Length 5110 mm 2630 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1680 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase Size 3100 mm 1810 mm