1959 Austin A 35 vs. 1962 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1962 Cadillac 62 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1365 kg more than 1959 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 514 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 35. (68 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin A 35 | 1962 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 35 | 62 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 6388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 582 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 98.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 2055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 75 L |