1959 Austin A 35 vs. 1976 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1976 Zastava 1500 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 1,480 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Zastava 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Zastava 1500 (70 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Zastava 1500 should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Zastava 1500 weights approximately 320 kg more than 1959 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Zastava 1500 (113 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1976 Zastava 1500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 35 | 1976 Zastava 1500 | |
| Make | Austin | Zastava |
| Model | A 35 | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 1480 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 113 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2430 mm |
