1959 Austin A 35 vs. 1992 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1992 Ford Tempo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Tempo (97 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Tempo weights approximately 475 kg more than 1959 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Tempo (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 35 | 1992 Ford Tempo | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | A 35 | Tempo |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 2307 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 171 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 93.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 84 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1165 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2540 mm |
