1959 Austin A 35 vs. 1995 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1995 Mazda Midge is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 35. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda Midge weights approximately 276 kg more than 1959 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda Midge (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 35 | 1995 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Austin | Mazda |
| Model | A 35 | Midge |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |
