1959 Austin A 35 vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 4,973 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (343 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 309 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 986 kg more than 1959 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (480 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 412 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1996 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin A 35 | 1996 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Austin | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | A 35 | E |
Year Released | 1959 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 4973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 343 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 480 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 96.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1676 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 80 L |