1959 Austin A 35 vs. 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee (225 HP) has 191 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 35. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 958 kg more than 1959 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee (407 Nm) has 339 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 35. (68 Nm). This means 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 35 | 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Austin | Jeep |
| Model | A 35 | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 5200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 225 HP |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1648 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 87 L |
