1959 Austin A 35 vs. 2000 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Eldorado (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1053 kg more than 1959 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac Eldorado (420 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 352 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 35 | 2000 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 35 | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 4565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 275 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 420 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1743 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 72 L |
