1959 Austin A 35 vs. 2000 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2000 Dodge Durango is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Durango weights approximately 745 kg more than 1959 Austin A 35.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Durango (454 Nm) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 35. (68 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 35 | 2000 Dodge Durango | |
| Make | Austin | Dodge |
| Model | A 35 | Durango |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 454 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1435 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2950 mm |
