1959 Austin A 35 vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 747 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 35. (68 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 35 | 2000 Holden HRT | |
| Make | Austin | Holden |
| Model | A 35 | HRT |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 815 Nm |
