1959 Austin A 35 vs. 2003 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2003 Honda CR-V is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Honda CR-V (160 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Honda CR-V weights approximately 828 kg more than 1959 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Honda CR-V (220 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 35. (68 Nm). This means 2003 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin A 35 | 2003 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Austin | Honda |
Model | A 35 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1518 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 58 L |