1959 Austin A 35 vs. 2005 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 260 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1104 kg more than 1959 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XJ (411 Nm) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 35. (68 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin A 35 | 2005 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Austin | Jaguar |
Model | A 35 | XJ |
Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 294 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 411 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1794 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 85 L |