1959 Austin A 35 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is equipped with a bigger engine.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak (820 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 752 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 35 | 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 35 | Kodiak |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 6600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 820 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 2000 mm |
