1959 Austin A 35 vs. 2006 MG TF
To start off, 2006 MG TF is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 MG TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 MG TF (135 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 MG TF weights approximately 490 kg more than 1959 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 MG TF (165 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 MG TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 35 | 2006 MG TF | |
| Make | Austin | MG |
| Model | A 35 | TF |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 89.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 50 L |
