1959 Austin A 35 vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (172 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 35. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 35.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 35. (68 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 35 | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Austin | Jeep |
| Model | A 35 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 3979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 172 HP |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 87 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 72 L |
