1959 Austin A 35 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (147 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 665 kg more than 1959 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 35 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Austin | Mazda |
| Model | A 35 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 1999 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 147 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 186 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 83.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1355 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 64 L |
