1959 Austin A 35 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Traverse
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Traverse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse (281 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Traverse weights approximately 1483 kg more than 1959 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse (360 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Traverse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin A 35 | 2010 Chevrolet Traverse | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 35 | Traverse |
Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 2173 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 5207 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1991 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1849 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3020 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 83 L |