1959 Austin A 40 vs. 1946 Maserati 6C
To start off, 1959 Austin A 40 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Maserati 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Maserati 6C would be higher. At 1,493 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Maserati 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Maserati 6C weights approximately 44 kg more than 1959 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 40 | 1946 Maserati 6C | |
| Make | Austin | Maserati |
| Model | A 40 | 6C |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1946 |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 1493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 804 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2560 mm |
