1959 Austin A 40 vs. 1962 Holden EK
To start off, 1962 Holden EK is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Holden EK (64 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 40. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Holden EK should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 40.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Holden EK (164 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 1962 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 40 | 1962 Holden EK | |
| Make | Austin | Holden |
| Model | A 40 | EK |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 64 HP |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 164 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
