1959 Austin A 40 vs. 1965 DKW Munga
To start off, 1965 DKW Munga is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 997 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 DKW Munga (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 DKW Munga weights approximately 350 kg more than 1959 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 40 | 1965 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Austin | DKW |
| Model | A 40 | Munga |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 31 L |
