1959 Austin A 40 vs. 1972 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1972 Cadillac Calais is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Cadillac Calais (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1370 kg more than 1959 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 40 | 1972 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 40 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 2130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 3310 mm |
