1959 Austin A 40 vs. 1972 Suzuki LJ 20
To start off, 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 997 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Austin A 40 (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Austin A 40 should accelerate faster than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20.
Because 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Austin A 40 (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1959 Austin A 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 40 | 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 | |
| Make | Austin | Suzuki |
| Model | A 40 | LJ 20 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 37 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
