1959 Austin A 40 vs. 1976 BMW 628
To start off, 1976 BMW 628 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 BMW 628 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 BMW 628 (185 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 BMW 628 should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 BMW 628 (260 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1976 BMW 628 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin A 40 | 1976 BMW 628 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | A 40 | 628 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 260 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 70 L |