1959 Austin A 40 vs. 1982 Seat Ronda

To start off, 1982 Seat Ronda is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,193 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Seat Ronda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Seat Ronda (61 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Seat Ronda should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Seat Ronda weights approximately 140 kg more than 1959 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1959 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Seat Ronda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Seat Ronda (88 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1982 Seat Ronda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Austin A 40 1982 Seat Ronda
Make Austin Seat
Model A 40 Ronda
Year Released 1959 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 997 cc 1193 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 34 HP 61 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 68 Nm 88 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 62.9 mm 75 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.2 mm 67.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 760 kg 900 kg
Vehicle Length 3670 mm 4020 mm
Vehicle Width 1520 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2130 mm 2460 mm