1959 Austin A 40 vs. 1985 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1985 Jaguar XJR is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 6,500 cc (12 cylinders), 1985 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Jaguar XJR (671 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 637 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 100 kg more than 1959 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin A 40 | 1985 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Austin | Jaguar |
Model | A 40 | XJR |
Year Released | 1959 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 6500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 671 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 90 L |