1959 Austin A 40 vs. 1988 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1988 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1988 Toyota Lite Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 340 kg more than 1959 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 40 | 1988 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Austin | Toyota |
| Model | A 40 | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1988 |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1910 mm |
