1959 Austin A 40 vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 40 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Renault Clio weights approximately 175 kg more than 1959 Austin A 40.
Because 1959 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin A 40 | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 40 | Clio |
Year Released | 1959 | 1998 |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 50 L |