1959 Austin A 40 vs. 2003 Isuzu Ascender
To start off, 2003 Isuzu Ascender is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Isuzu Ascender is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Isuzu Ascender (282 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 248 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Isuzu Ascender should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 40.
Because 2003 Isuzu Ascender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Isuzu Ascender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Isuzu Ascender (441 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 373 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 Isuzu Ascender will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin A 40 | 2003 Isuzu Ascender | |
Make | Austin | Isuzu |
Model | A 40 | Ascender |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 441 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 3280 mm |