1959 Austin A 40 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Express is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Express (300 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 1914 kg more than 1959 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Express (488 Nm) has 420 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin A 40 | 2004 Chevrolet Express | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 40 | Express |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 5998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 488 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 12 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 2674 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 117 L |