1959 Austin A 40 vs. 2004 Renault Scenic

To start off, 2004 Renault Scenic is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Scenic (74 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Scenic weights approximately 944 kg more than 1959 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1959 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Renault Scenic (105 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 2004 Renault Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications: