1959 Austin A 40 vs. 2005 Mahindra Bolero
To start off, 2005 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,523 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mahindra Bolero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mahindra Bolero (62 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mahindra Bolero should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1959 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mahindra Bolero (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 Mahindra Bolero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin A 40 | 2005 Mahindra Bolero | |
Make | Austin | Mahindra |
Model | A 40 | Bolero |
Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 2523 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1780 kg |