1959 Austin A 40 vs. 2010 Nissan Note
To start off, 2010 Nissan Note is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,386 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Note is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Note (89 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 40. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Note should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Note weights approximately 292 kg more than 1959 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin A 40 | 2010 Nissan Note | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 40 | Note |
Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2600 mm |