1959 Austin A 55 vs. 1964 Austin A 60
To start off, 1964 Austin A 60 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 55 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 55. (54 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 55.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin A 60 (122 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 55. (68 Nm). This means 1964 Austin A 60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 55.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin A 55 | 1964 Austin A 60 | |
Make | Austin | Austin |
Model | A 55 | A 60 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 54 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 68 Nm | 122 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 34 L |